https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417901 The Tribunal set aside the decision denying the exemption notification based on doubts about the Country of Origin certificate. It found the second certificate, signed by Mr. Rumaiti, to be genuine, emphasizing the Revenue's failure to verify with the Indonesian government. The case was remanded to the Adjudicating authority for a fresh decision within three months, citing procedural lapses and the need for proper verification under AIFTA Rules and Customs regulations. en-us Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417901 The Tribunal set aside the decision denying the exemption notification based on doubts about the Country of Origin certificate. It found the second certificate, signed by Mr. Rumaiti, to be genuine, emphasizing the Revenue's failure to verify with the Indonesian government. The case was remanded to the Adjudicating authority for a fresh decision within three months, citing procedural lapses and the need for proper verification under AIFTA Rules and Customs regulations. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417901