<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 150 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417899</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case, allowing the appeal by condoning the minimal delay in filing the appeal challenging the rejection of a refund claim under the Central Excise Act, 1994. Emphasizing deciding on merits and liberal application of limitation laws, the Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) should have exercised discretion to condone the delay. The appellant&#039;s appeal was accepted for further consideration on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 07:00:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 150 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417899</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case, allowing the appeal by condoning the minimal delay in filing the appeal challenging the rejection of a refund claim under the Central Excise Act, 1994. Emphasizing deciding on merits and liberal application of limitation laws, the Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) should have exercised discretion to condone the delay. The appellant&#039;s appeal was accepted for further consideration on its merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>