<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 148 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417897</link>
    <description>The Appeals were dismissed as no error was found in the rejection of the Section 9 Application. The judgment emphasized the importance of resolving pre-existing disputes before initiating insolvency proceedings, ensuring fairness and accuracy in legal proceedings. The dispute over the supply back of material and the time limitation issue were crucial factors leading to the rejection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 07:00:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 148 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417897</link>
      <description>The Appeals were dismissed as no error was found in the rejection of the Section 9 Application. The judgment emphasized the importance of resolving pre-existing disputes before initiating insolvency proceedings, ensuring fairness and accuracy in legal proceedings. The dispute over the supply back of material and the time limitation issue were crucial factors leading to the rejection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>