<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 140 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417889</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to re-examine the issue of unjust enrichment and the eligibility of the refund claim. The respondent is to be given a reasonable opportunity to present evidence supporting their claim. The Commissioner (Appeals) is expected to pass a new order considering all aspects within three months from the respondent&#039;s appearance for the hearing. The appeal is thus allowed by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 140 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417889</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to re-examine the issue of unjust enrichment and the eligibility of the refund claim. The respondent is to be given a reasonable opportunity to present evidence supporting their claim. The Commissioner (Appeals) is expected to pass a new order considering all aspects within three months from the respondent&#039;s appearance for the hearing. The appeal is thus allowed by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>