<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 137 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417886</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was held admissible on iron and steel items used to fabricate capital goods and support structures for cranes and connected manufacturing equipment, because credit must be tested on receipt and use of inputs, not by a rigid one-to-one correlation with each finished item; the evidence showed use in the factory and there was no contrary factual basis to deny it. Credit was also admissible on invoices treated as improper, since the documents substantially contained the required particulars, including address, registration details and separately indicated duty. The credit disallowance and related penalties were therefore set aside, with consequential relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 06:59:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 137 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417886</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was held admissible on iron and steel items used to fabricate capital goods and support structures for cranes and connected manufacturing equipment, because credit must be tested on receipt and use of inputs, not by a rigid one-to-one correlation with each finished item; the evidence showed use in the factory and there was no contrary factual basis to deny it. Credit was also admissible on invoices treated as improper, since the documents substantially contained the required particulars, including address, registration details and separately indicated duty. The credit disallowance and related penalties were therefore set aside, with consequential relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>