<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1597 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300463</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the claims for depreciation and interest expenses. It emphasized that the crucial factor was the use of the assets for business purposes and the company&#039;s investment in those assets, rather than the registration details under the Motor Vehicles Act. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, setting aside the disallowances made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 06:58:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1597 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300463</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the claims for depreciation and interest expenses. It emphasized that the crucial factor was the use of the assets for business purposes and the company&#039;s investment in those assets, rather than the registration details under the Motor Vehicles Act. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, setting aside the disallowances made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>