<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1889 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300466</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The decision emphasized the necessity of proper assessment and evidence in disallowance cases to prevent unjust penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 06:58:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1889 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300466</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The decision emphasized the necessity of proper assessment and evidence in disallowance cases to prevent unjust penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>