https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417878 The High Court deferred the hearing of the writ petition to allow the respondent's advocate to confirm the firm's eligibility for SEIS benefits, clarifying that manual submission of applications was not permitted. The court emphasized the cap of Rs. 5 crore per IEC for service exports in FY 2019-20 and the requirement for online filing of SEIS claims. The respondents were directed to file a reply affidavit by January 17, 2022, and any rejoinder by January 21, 2022, with the writ petition to be further considered on January 25, 2022, ensuring no equity among parties. en-us Fri, 17 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Feb 2022 06:58:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417878 The High Court deferred the hearing of the writ petition to allow the respondent's advocate to confirm the firm's eligibility for SEIS benefits, clarifying that manual submission of applications was not permitted. The court emphasized the cap of Rs. 5 crore per IEC for service exports in FY 2019-20 and the requirement for online filing of SEIS claims. The respondents were directed to file a reply affidavit by January 17, 2022, and any rejoinder by January 21, 2022, with the writ petition to be further considered on January 25, 2022, ensuring no equity among parties. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 17 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417878