<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Upholds Validity of Assessment Notice on ITC Carry Forward Under WBVAT Act Section 46; Broad Interpretation Affirmed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61769</link>
    <description>Validity of assessment notice u/s 46 of WBVAT Act - carry forward of excess ITC to next FY - The rule of ejusdem generis is inapplicable to the case on hand as Section 46 (1) (b) does not contain enumeration of specific words; the circumstance enumerated in clause (b) does not constitute a class or category; contingencies mentioned therein is not exhausted by enumeration; the general terms do not follow the enumeration and there is clear indication of a different legislative intent. - The words or “for any other reasons” should be given the widest meaning bearing in mind the scheme of the provisions of WBVAT - the notice was issued by respondent on the assessee are valid in law. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 08:01:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 08:01:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Upholds Validity of Assessment Notice on ITC Carry Forward Under WBVAT Act Section 46; Broad Interpretation Affirmed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61769</link>
      <description>Validity of assessment notice u/s 46 of WBVAT Act - carry forward of excess ITC to next FY - The rule of ejusdem generis is inapplicable to the case on hand as Section 46 (1) (b) does not contain enumeration of specific words; the circumstance enumerated in clause (b) does not constitute a class or category; contingencies mentioned therein is not exhausted by enumeration; the general terms do not follow the enumeration and there is clear indication of a different legislative intent. - The words or “for any other reasons” should be given the widest meaning bearing in mind the scheme of the provisions of WBVAT - the notice was issued by respondent on the assessee are valid in law. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 08:01:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=61769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>