https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417837 Punitive or coercive orders enforcing an Emergency Arbitrator award cannot stand without a fair opportunity of hearing, and contempt-like consequences under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC require proof of wilful disobedience. As such proof was absent and the procedural opportunity was insufficient, the enforcement and punitive directions were set aside. The Court also found that the later order refusing interim relief had not properly considered the earlier orders and that the issues concerning the effect of the Emergency Arbitrator award and the Arbitral Tribunal's jurisdiction required fresh consideration by the High Court. The matter was remanded for decision on merits. en-us Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Feb 2022 13:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417837 Punitive or coercive orders enforcing an Emergency Arbitrator award cannot stand without a fair opportunity of hearing, and contempt-like consequences under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC require proof of wilful disobedience. As such proof was absent and the procedural opportunity was insufficient, the enforcement and punitive directions were set aside. The Court also found that the later order refusing interim relief had not properly considered the earlier orders and that the issues concerning the effect of the Emergency Arbitrator award and the Arbitral Tribunal's jurisdiction required fresh consideration by the High Court. The matter was remanded for decision on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417837