<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 888 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300454</link>
    <description>The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated against the Corporate Debtor following a Section 9 Petition by a Financial Creditor, resulting in the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). Despite only one claim from a financial creditor being received, the CoC decided on liquidation. The Company&#039;s financial position revealed asset deficiencies, leading to the Tribunal confirming the RP&#039;s appointment. With no resolution plan in sight, liquidation was sought under Section 33 of the Code, approved by the CoC and Tribunal. The Tribunal then issued a liquidation order appointing the RP as the Liquidator and outlining the liquidation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 07:31:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 888 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300454</link>
      <description>The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated against the Corporate Debtor following a Section 9 Petition by a Financial Creditor, resulting in the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). Despite only one claim from a financial creditor being received, the CoC decided on liquidation. The Company&#039;s financial position revealed asset deficiencies, leading to the Tribunal confirming the RP&#039;s appointment. With no resolution plan in sight, liquidation was sought under Section 33 of the Code, approved by the CoC and Tribunal. The Tribunal then issued a liquidation order appointing the RP as the Liquidator and outlining the liquidation process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>