<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Goods caught by the authorities</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117793</link>
    <description>Detention followed incorrect listing of the recipient site as an additional place of business and mismatched e-way bill details during bill-to-ship-to movement of iron and steel; central issues are whether destination sites must be registered, whether e-way bill/address discrepancies justify tax and penalty, and the availability of appeals and reliance on cited administrative decisions when contesting detention and recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 09:34:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Goods caught by the authorities</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117793</link>
      <description>Detention followed incorrect listing of the recipient site as an additional place of business and mismatched e-way bill details during bill-to-ship-to movement of iron and steel; central issues are whether destination sites must be registered, whether e-way bill/address discrepancies justify tax and penalty, and the availability of appeals and reliance on cited administrative decisions when contesting detention and recovery.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 09:34:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>