<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 80 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417829</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of provision for ex-gratia payments, confirming compliance with Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules. It was determined that the CIT(A) appropriately provided an opportunity to the assessing officer and that rectification under section 154 of the Income Tax Act was applicable. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the Assessment Year 2016-17 was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 08:45:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 80 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417829</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of provision for ex-gratia payments, confirming compliance with Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules. It was determined that the CIT(A) appropriately provided an opportunity to the assessing officer and that rectification under section 154 of the Income Tax Act was applicable. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the Assessment Year 2016-17 was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>