https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417803 Where issuance of the cheque, the underlying borrowal, dishonour, and statutory notice were admitted, disputes over whether the cheque was given as a security cheque, whether it was later filled for a higher amount, and whether the outstanding liability was lower were treated as questions of fact for trial. The Court held that such disputed issues, including the effect of SARFAESI proceedings and NPA-related interest calculations, did not justify quashing the prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act at the Section 482 CrPC stage. The complaint was therefore allowed to proceed. en-us Fri, 21 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Feb 2022 11:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417803 Where issuance of the cheque, the underlying borrowal, dishonour, and statutory notice were admitted, disputes over whether the cheque was given as a security cheque, whether it was later filled for a higher amount, and whether the outstanding liability was lower were treated as questions of fact for trial. The Court held that such disputed issues, including the effect of SARFAESI proceedings and NPA-related interest calculations, did not justify quashing the prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act at the Section 482 CrPC stage. The complaint was therefore allowed to proceed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417803