https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300440 The High Court upheld the trial court's decision to dismiss the petition seeking leave to appeal against the rejection of a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish the respondent's liability for the cheque amount, as there was no agreement for interest payment and insufficient proof of the alleged liability. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed based on the lack of evidence supporting the petitioner's claims. en-us Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Feb 2022 08:44:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300440 The High Court upheld the trial court's decision to dismiss the petition seeking leave to appeal against the rejection of a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish the respondent's liability for the cheque amount, as there was no agreement for interest payment and insufficient proof of the alleged liability. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed based on the lack of evidence supporting the petitioner's claims. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300440