<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1294 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300445</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that delayed deposits of PF/ESIC contributions, made before filing the income tax return, should be considered allowable expenditure. The ITAT emphasized established judicial precedents and taxation principles, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2019-20.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 08:44:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1294 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300445</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that delayed deposits of PF/ESIC contributions, made before filing the income tax return, should be considered allowable expenditure. The ITAT emphasized established judicial precedents and taxation principles, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2019-20.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>