<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (2) TMI 135 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300431</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the suit for possession over the grove was barred by time and should have been dismissed. The appeal was allowed, and the judgments and decrees of the trial court, the first appellate court, and the learned single judge were set aside. The suit of the plaintiffs was dismissed with costs to the appellant throughout.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2022 15:59:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (2) TMI 135 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300431</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the suit for possession over the grove was barred by time and should have been dismissed. The appeal was allowed, and the judgments and decrees of the trial court, the first appellate court, and the learned single judge were set aside. The suit of the plaintiffs was dismissed with costs to the appellant throughout.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>