<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (2) TMI 60 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27888</link>
    <description>The judgment addressed the deductibility of sales tax liabilities in income computation. It involved a dispute over liabilities of a dissolved firm taken over by an individual. The Income Tax Officer initially disallowed the deduction due to lack of evidence, but the Appellate Assistant Commissioner allowed it. The Tribunal had conflicting views, with one member referencing a Supreme Court decision on timing of liability determination. The judgment upheld the deduction based on the timing of liability determination and the hybrid accounting system, ruling in favor of the assessee against the Department. It clarified principles of law and accounting regarding claiming deductions for sales tax liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:33:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (2) TMI 60 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27888</link>
      <description>The judgment addressed the deductibility of sales tax liabilities in income computation. It involved a dispute over liabilities of a dissolved firm taken over by an individual. The Income Tax Officer initially disallowed the deduction due to lack of evidence, but the Appellate Assistant Commissioner allowed it. The Tribunal had conflicting views, with one member referencing a Supreme Court decision on timing of liability determination. The judgment upheld the deduction based on the timing of liability determination and the hybrid accounting system, ruling in favor of the assessee against the Department. It clarified principles of law and accounting regarding claiming deductions for sales tax liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>