https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417800 The HC addressed a contractor's petition regarding delayed GST receivable amounts. After completing contracted work, petitioner had not paid GST based on government circulars indicating refund eligibility. Despite multiple representations, respondents failed to disburse the amounts. The court declined to order immediate payment, instead directing the 1st respondent to decide on petitioner's eligibility within three months after hearing both parties. The judgment emphasized that if eligibility is established, disbursement should occur promptly. The petition was disposed of with these directions. en-us Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 14:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417800 The HC addressed a contractor's petition regarding delayed GST receivable amounts. After completing contracted work, petitioner had not paid GST based on government circulars indicating refund eligibility. Despite multiple representations, respondents failed to disburse the amounts. The court declined to order immediate payment, instead directing the 1st respondent to decide on petitioner's eligibility within three months after hearing both parties. The judgment emphasized that if eligibility is established, disbursement should occur promptly. The petition was disposed of with these directions. Case-Laws GST Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417800