<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 35 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417784</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of Rs. 7,86,03,706/- as deemed dividend, considering it a business transaction. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed that Rs. 2,66,65,600/- was not deemed dividend as it benefited the company&#039;s business. The issue of Rs. 30,12,910/- interest payment was remanded for verification on TDS deduction. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s challenge on the protective addition, as the substantive addition was maintained in the director&#039;s case. The Assessee&#039;s appeal in ITA No. 2522/PUN/2017 was allowed, while the Assessee&#039;s appeal in ITA No. 2526/PUN/2017 was dismissed. The Revenue&#039;s appeal in ITA No. 135/PUN/2018 was dismissed, and in ITA No. 152/PUN/2018 was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 23:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 35 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417784</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of Rs. 7,86,03,706/- as deemed dividend, considering it a business transaction. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed that Rs. 2,66,65,600/- was not deemed dividend as it benefited the company&#039;s business. The issue of Rs. 30,12,910/- interest payment was remanded for verification on TDS deduction. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s challenge on the protective addition, as the substantive addition was maintained in the director&#039;s case. The Assessee&#039;s appeal in ITA No. 2522/PUN/2017 was allowed, while the Assessee&#039;s appeal in ITA No. 2526/PUN/2017 was dismissed. The Revenue&#039;s appeal in ITA No. 135/PUN/2018 was dismissed, and in ITA No. 152/PUN/2018 was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>