<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 31 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417780</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance under Section 14A and recognizing the Short-Term Capital Loss on the forfeiture of share warrants. The decision was based on the lack of objective satisfaction by the Assessing Officer in applying Rule 8D and the recognition of the forfeiture of share warrants as resulting in a deductible Short-Term Capital Loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2022 08:31:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 31 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417780</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance under Section 14A and recognizing the Short-Term Capital Loss on the forfeiture of share warrants. The decision was based on the lack of objective satisfaction by the Assessing Officer in applying Rule 8D and the recognition of the forfeiture of share warrants as resulting in a deductible Short-Term Capital Loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>