<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (9) TMI 60 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27874</link>
    <description>Paragraph 3 of the Dadar and Nagar Haveli and Goa, Daman and Diu (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1964 covered the assessee as a person within clause (ii) of sub-paragraph (1), and the factual basis supported that classification. Paragraph 17 was treated as an independent relaxation provision for assessees within paragraph 3, clause (i)(a) or clause (ii), permitting a penalty below the statutory minimum, subject only to the express exclusion for assessment years commencing on or after 1 April 1967. The relaxation was also not confined to penalty referable only to income connected with the former Portuguese territory; it extended to the penalty as a whole, including income received or deemed to be received in Bombay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:34:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (9) TMI 60 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27874</link>
      <description>Paragraph 3 of the Dadar and Nagar Haveli and Goa, Daman and Diu (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1964 covered the assessee as a person within clause (ii) of sub-paragraph (1), and the factual basis supported that classification. Paragraph 17 was treated as an independent relaxation provision for assessees within paragraph 3, clause (i)(a) or clause (ii), permitting a penalty below the statutory minimum, subject only to the express exclusion for assessment years commencing on or after 1 April 1967. The relaxation was also not confined to penalty referable only to income connected with the former Portuguese territory; it extended to the penalty as a whole, including income received or deemed to be received in Bombay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>