https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300418 In second appeal, concurrent findings of fact are ordinarily respected, but they can still raise a substantial question of law if recorded de hors the pleadings, on no evidence, by misreading material evidence, or in violation of law. The Court noted that issues concerning the character of the suit land, the application of forest and revenue laws, the validity of the mining lease, and any statutory bar required examination under Section 100 CPC. The High Court was therefore not justified in summarily dismissing the second appeals, and the matters were remitted for fresh decision after framing appropriate substantial questions of law. en-us Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Jan 2022 21:09:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300418 In second appeal, concurrent findings of fact are ordinarily respected, but they can still raise a substantial question of law if recorded de hors the pleadings, on no evidence, by misreading material evidence, or in violation of law. The Court noted that issues concerning the character of the suit land, the application of forest and revenue laws, the validity of the mining lease, and any statutory bar required examination under Section 100 CPC. The High Court was therefore not justified in summarily dismissing the second appeals, and the matters were remitted for fresh decision after framing appropriate substantial questions of law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300418