<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (3) TMI 254 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300407</link>
    <description>Service of a section 148 notice for reassessment must be effected in the manner prescribed by law, and affixation is valid only after reasonable and diligent attempts at personal service; on the facts, repeated attempts at the assessee&#039;s known address supported valid service. Reopening is also justified where the assessing officer has relevant material, including third-party information and recorded reasons, to form a bona fide belief that income has escaped assessment. A challenge that the officer acted at another&#039;s dictate fails unless surrender of independent judgment is shown; inter-departmental communication alone is insufficient. The reassessment challenge was rejected in entirety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 15:52:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (3) TMI 254 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300407</link>
      <description>Service of a section 148 notice for reassessment must be effected in the manner prescribed by law, and affixation is valid only after reasonable and diligent attempts at personal service; on the facts, repeated attempts at the assessee&#039;s known address supported valid service. Reopening is also justified where the assessing officer has relevant material, including third-party information and recorded reasons, to form a bona fide belief that income has escaped assessment. A challenge that the officer acted at another&#039;s dictate fails unless surrender of independent judgment is shown; inter-departmental communication alone is insufficient. The reassessment challenge was rejected in entirety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>