https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300405 Superior courts must exercise restraint before making adverse remarks against subordinate judicial officers, and criticism must be justified by the record and expressed with fairness. The remarks imputing casualness and extraneous considerations were found unwarranted and ordered to be expunged. In relation to bail under the NDPS framework, a Sessions Judge acting consistently with the prevailing Division Bench view could not be said to have lacked jurisdiction merely because the exercise of discretion was disputed. The strictures based on alleged lack of jurisdiction were therefore not justified. en-us Mon, 24 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Jan 2022 13:45:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300405 Superior courts must exercise restraint before making adverse remarks against subordinate judicial officers, and criticism must be justified by the record and expressed with fairness. The remarks imputing casualness and extraneous considerations were found unwarranted and ordered to be expunged. In relation to bail under the NDPS framework, a Sessions Judge acting consistently with the prevailing Division Bench view could not be said to have lacked jurisdiction merely because the exercise of discretion was disputed. The strictures based on alleged lack of jurisdiction were therefore not justified. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300405