https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300403 Concurrent findings of fact can be interfered with in second appeal under Section 100 CPC when they rest on perversity, misreading of evidence, contradictory assumptions, or an erroneous legal approach causing injustice. In this dispute over whether property was wakf property, the courts below had proceeded on unsupported and inconsistent assumptions about acquisition of the property, the validity and acceptance of the gift and wakf deeds, and the effect of earlier proceedings. The Supreme Court held that the High Court correctly identified these defects and did not exceed the limits of second appellate jurisdiction. The challenge failed and the High Court's judgment was left undisturbed. en-us Wed, 08 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:37:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300403 Concurrent findings of fact can be interfered with in second appeal under Section 100 CPC when they rest on perversity, misreading of evidence, contradictory assumptions, or an erroneous legal approach causing injustice. In this dispute over whether property was wakf property, the courts below had proceeded on unsupported and inconsistent assumptions about acquisition of the property, the validity and acceptance of the gift and wakf deeds, and the effect of earlier proceedings. The Supreme Court held that the High Court correctly identified these defects and did not exceed the limits of second appellate jurisdiction. The challenge failed and the High Court's judgment was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300403