https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300401 The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench's decision, affirming the quashing of notifications issued under Section 4(1) read with Section 17 and Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court found the urgency clause invoked by the State Government to be unjustified, depriving the respondents of their right to file objections under Section 5A. The appeals were dismissed, and each party was ordered to bear their own costs. en-us Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:14:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300401 The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench's decision, affirming the quashing of notifications issued under Section 4(1) read with Section 17 and Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court found the urgency clause invoked by the State Government to be unjustified, depriving the respondents of their right to file objections under Section 5A. The appeals were dismissed, and each party was ordered to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300401