https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300400 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the grant of occupancy rights to the respondent under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act. The Court held that the appellant's arguments, based on the agreement for sale and the written statement, lacked substantial evidence to rebut the presumption of correctness of the entry in the revenue record. As the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence, the Court upheld the lower courts' decision, emphasizing the necessity of substantial evidence to challenge legal presumptions. The appeal was dismissed without costs awarded to either party. en-us Thu, 01 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:58:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300400 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the grant of occupancy rights to the respondent under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act. The Court held that the appellant's arguments, based on the agreement for sale and the written statement, lacked substantial evidence to rebut the presumption of correctness of the entry in the revenue record. As the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence, the Court upheld the lower courts' decision, emphasizing the necessity of substantial evidence to challenge legal presumptions. The appeal was dismissed without costs awarded to either party. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300400