https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417721 The Court upheld the jurisdiction of DRI officers under the Customs Act, 1962, emphasizing the availability of remedies under Section 128 within 60 days. It reviewed the legality of the confiscation of seized goods and imposition of penalties under Section 114 AA, assessing the procedural validity of the show cause notice and subsequent orders. Despite objections raised by the petitioner regarding penal actions, the Court noted the importance of pursuing statutory appeals under Sections 128 and 129, ultimately dismissing the writ petition for lack of an alternative and efficacious remedy of appeal. en-us Thu, 13 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417721 The Court upheld the jurisdiction of DRI officers under the Customs Act, 1962, emphasizing the availability of remedies under Section 128 within 60 days. It reviewed the legality of the confiscation of seized goods and imposition of penalties under Section 114 AA, assessing the procedural validity of the show cause notice and subsequent orders. Despite objections raised by the petitioner regarding penal actions, the Court noted the importance of pursuing statutory appeals under Sections 128 and 129, ultimately dismissing the writ petition for lack of an alternative and efficacious remedy of appeal. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 13 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417721