<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1182 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417717</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that the Adjudicating Authority cannot direct the Committee of Creditors (CoC) to consider a settlement proposal after the CoC has approved a resolution plan and while awaiting the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s approval. The NCLAT emphasized that once a resolution plan is approved by the CoC, negotiations or modifications are not permissible. Additionally, the NCLAT ruled that the Adjudicating Authority lacks jurisdiction to compel the CoC to consider a settlement proposal that does not adhere to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) or its regulations. The NCLAT set aside previous orders directing consideration of a non-compliant settlement proposal, deeming them beyond the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1182 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417717</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that the Adjudicating Authority cannot direct the Committee of Creditors (CoC) to consider a settlement proposal after the CoC has approved a resolution plan and while awaiting the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s approval. The NCLAT emphasized that once a resolution plan is approved by the CoC, negotiations or modifications are not permissible. Additionally, the NCLAT ruled that the Adjudicating Authority lacks jurisdiction to compel the CoC to consider a settlement proposal that does not adhere to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) or its regulations. The NCLAT set aside previous orders directing consideration of a non-compliant settlement proposal, deeming them beyond the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>