<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1174 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417709</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing cenvat credit on disputed items like M.S. Grating, Stair Case, and LED Street Light, as well as on inputs used for power generation. The Tribunal held that the items were eligible for cenvat credit as inputs, and the disallowance was unjustified. Additionally, the Tribunal found the show cause notice to be time-barred and set aside the penalty, granting the appellant consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 07:18:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1174 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417709</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing cenvat credit on disputed items like M.S. Grating, Stair Case, and LED Street Light, as well as on inputs used for power generation. The Tribunal held that the items were eligible for cenvat credit as inputs, and the disallowance was unjustified. Additionally, the Tribunal found the show cause notice to be time-barred and set aside the penalty, granting the appellant consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>