<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 1083 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300386</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the profit on redemption of IDBI deep discount bonds should be treated as capital gain, not income from other sources. The circular in question was deemed to have prospective effect, benefiting the assessee. The appeal was allowed in part, with the Tribunal dismissing the issue regarding the charging of interest under Sections 234B and 234C of the Act as inconsequential due to the favorable outcome on the first issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2022 14:06:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 1083 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300386</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the profit on redemption of IDBI deep discount bonds should be treated as capital gain, not income from other sources. The circular in question was deemed to have prospective effect, benefiting the assessee. The appeal was allowed in part, with the Tribunal dismissing the issue regarding the charging of interest under Sections 234B and 234C of the Act as inconsequential due to the favorable outcome on the first issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>