<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (9) TMI 56 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27857</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, affirming that the income from the estate left by the late husband was to be assessed in the hands of the assessee as an individual. The judgment highlighted the necessity of providing concrete evidence to establish the character of the property as Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), particularly in cases where the property did not originally belong to a joint family. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:06:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (9) TMI 56 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27857</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, affirming that the income from the estate left by the late husband was to be assessed in the hands of the assessee as an individual. The judgment highlighted the necessity of providing concrete evidence to establish the character of the property as Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), particularly in cases where the property did not originally belong to a joint family. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>