<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1154 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417689</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the validity of the re-assessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, the addition of Rs. 1 crore as unexplained credit under Section 68 was challenged successfully due to violation of natural justice principles. The issue was remanded to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration, directing the assessee to be given a fair opportunity to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2022 08:44:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1154 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417689</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the validity of the re-assessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, the addition of Rs. 1 crore as unexplained credit under Section 68 was challenged successfully due to violation of natural justice principles. The issue was remanded to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration, directing the assessee to be given a fair opportunity to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>