<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1153 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417688</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order passed by the Pr. CIT under Section 263 and restored the original assessment order, allowing the appeal of the assessee. The Tribunal held that the assessment order was based on due verification and examination, and the Pr. CIT failed to establish that it was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The Tribunal emphasized that canceling the assessment order solely on the basis of inadequate inquiry was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2022 08:44:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1153 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417688</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order passed by the Pr. CIT under Section 263 and restored the original assessment order, allowing the appeal of the assessee. The Tribunal held that the assessment order was based on due verification and examination, and the Pr. CIT failed to establish that it was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The Tribunal emphasized that canceling the assessment order solely on the basis of inadequate inquiry was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>