<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1147 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417682</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to apply the internal Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) as the most appropriate method for determining the arm&#039;s length price (ALP) of international transactions. The ITAT emphasized the reliability of internal comparables over external ones, citing previous decisions and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections. The judgment was pronounced on November 29, 2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2022 08:44:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1147 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417682</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to apply the internal Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) as the most appropriate method for determining the arm&#039;s length price (ALP) of international transactions. The ITAT emphasized the reliability of internal comparables over external ones, citing previous decisions and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections. The judgment was pronounced on November 29, 2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>