<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1139 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417674</link>
    <description>Allegations of large-scale corporate fraud, falsification of financial statements and books, and diversion of funds through letters of credit were treated as a serious economic offence affecting public interest. The Court found prima facie material showing reasonable grounds to believe the applicant&#039;s involvement, so the twin conditions for bail under Section 212(6)(ii) of the Companies Act, 2013 were not satisfied. It further held that the seriousness of the offence and the available material did not justify bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The medical plea was rejected for lack of supporting material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2022 08:43:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1139 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417674</link>
      <description>Allegations of large-scale corporate fraud, falsification of financial statements and books, and diversion of funds through letters of credit were treated as a serious economic offence affecting public interest. The Court found prima facie material showing reasonable grounds to believe the applicant&#039;s involvement, so the twin conditions for bail under Section 212(6)(ii) of the Companies Act, 2013 were not satisfied. It further held that the seriousness of the offence and the available material did not justify bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The medical plea was rejected for lack of supporting material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>