<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (6) TMI 45 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27852</link>
    <description>The court held that the expenditure incurred by the assessee-company was revenue in nature, favoring the assessee. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat the expenditure as revenue was justified based on the analysis of the agreements and relevant legal principles. The court concluded that the expenditure was related to the profit-making process and not for acquiring any capital assets, thus determining it as revenue expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:53:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (6) TMI 45 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27852</link>
      <description>The court held that the expenditure incurred by the assessee-company was revenue in nature, favoring the assessee. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat the expenditure as revenue was justified based on the analysis of the agreements and relevant legal principles. The court concluded that the expenditure was related to the profit-making process and not for acquiring any capital assets, thus determining it as revenue expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>