<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1135 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417670</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal as lacking merit. It determined that the Respondent qualified as an Operational Creditor with a legitimate claim for Operational Debt, finding no pre-existing dispute and rejecting the time-barred claim argument. The original order was affirmed, and the appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2022 08:43:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1135 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417670</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal as lacking merit. It determined that the Respondent qualified as an Operational Creditor with a legitimate claim for Operational Debt, finding no pre-existing dispute and rejecting the time-barred claim argument. The original order was affirmed, and the appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>