https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417660 The Tribunal determined that the appellant did not qualify as an "intermediary" under Rule 2(f) of POPSR, 2012, and the services provided were considered export services. As a result, the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellant and set aside the impugned orders, providing consequential relief. en-us Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Oct 2022 14:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417660 The Tribunal determined that the appellant did not qualify as an "intermediary" under Rule 2(f) of POPSR, 2012, and the services provided were considered export services. As a result, the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellant and set aside the impugned orders, providing consequential relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417660