https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417653 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned order due to the violation of natural justice principles by denying cross-examination of key witnesses. The case, based on contradictory statements lacking corroborative evidence, failed to prove the charge of clandestine removal of goods. Consequently, the appeals were successful, providing consequential relief to the appellants. en-us Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Jan 2022 08:41:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417653 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned order due to the violation of natural justice principles by denying cross-examination of key witnesses. The case, based on contradictory statements lacking corroborative evidence, failed to prove the charge of clandestine removal of goods. Consequently, the appeals were successful, providing consequential relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417653