<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1116 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417651</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the orders passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under Section 263, holding that the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted sufficient inquiries and verifications during the assessment proceedings. The Tribunal found that the PCIT&#039;s decision was merely a difference in opinion and lacked a factual basis, ultimately allowing the appeals filed by the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 20:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1116 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417651</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the orders passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under Section 263, holding that the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted sufficient inquiries and verifications during the assessment proceedings. The Tribunal found that the PCIT&#039;s decision was merely a difference in opinion and lacked a factual basis, ultimately allowing the appeals filed by the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>