<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1235 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300379</link>
    <description>Regular bail may be granted in a commercial lending dispute where the investigation is substantially complete, the charge-sheet has been filed, and continued custody is not shown to be necessary. The Court treated the nature and gravity of the accusation, the likelihood of abscondence, and any risk of tampering with evidence as governing bail factors, but found no concrete flight risk or specific apprehension of interference. The petitioner had joined investigation on several occasions, the alleged transactions were document-based, and similarly placed co-accused directors had not been arrested. Bail was therefore allowed subject to conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 19:40:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1235 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300379</link>
      <description>Regular bail may be granted in a commercial lending dispute where the investigation is substantially complete, the charge-sheet has been filed, and continued custody is not shown to be necessary. The Court treated the nature and gravity of the accusation, the likelihood of abscondence, and any risk of tampering with evidence as governing bail factors, but found no concrete flight risk or specific apprehension of interference. The petitioner had joined investigation on several occasions, the alleged transactions were document-based, and similarly placed co-accused directors had not been arrested. Bail was therefore allowed subject to conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>