<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 40 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27845</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the inclusion of amounts related to reserves for doubtful debts in the computation of capital under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964. However, the court held against the assessee concerning the inclusion of amounts related to the dividend reserve account and the gratuity reserve account. The judgment followed the decision in Vazir Sultan Tobacco Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1981] 132 ITR 559 (SC) and made no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:40:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 40 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27845</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the inclusion of amounts related to reserves for doubtful debts in the computation of capital under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964. However, the court held against the assessee concerning the inclusion of amounts related to the dividend reserve account and the gratuity reserve account. The judgment followed the decision in Vazir Sultan Tobacco Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1981] 132 ITR 559 (SC) and made no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>