<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1112 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417647</link>
    <description>A constitutional challenge to provisions of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was admitted for consideration, with notice issued to the Attorney General for India. The Court permitted amendment of the petition to include a subsequent notice of demand and recorded that, if coercive action is proposed, the petitioners may seek interim relief on prior notice. The matter remains pending, with interim protection preserved only in that limited procedural form.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1112 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417647</link>
      <description>A constitutional challenge to provisions of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was admitted for consideration, with notice issued to the Attorney General for India. The Court permitted amendment of the petition to include a subsequent notice of demand and recorded that, if coercive action is proposed, the petitioners may seek interim relief on prior notice. The matter remains pending, with interim protection preserved only in that limited procedural form.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>