<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1112 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417647</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC allowed the Petitioner to amend the petition to include subsequent notice of demand challenging provisions of the Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. The Attorney General for India has been issued notice returnable on 14 March 2022. Respondents are directed to file an affidavit-in-reply within four weeks. The Petitioner can seek interim relief if coercive action is proposed after providing 48 hours&#039; notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:03:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1112 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417647</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC allowed the Petitioner to amend the petition to include subsequent notice of demand challenging provisions of the Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. The Attorney General for India has been issued notice returnable on 14 March 2022. Respondents are directed to file an affidavit-in-reply within four weeks. The Petitioner can seek interim relief if coercive action is proposed after providing 48 hours&#039; notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>