<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1104 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417639</link>
    <description>Rejection of an assessee&#039;s application under Section 270AA was unsustainable because the proviso to Section 270AA(4) requires an effective opportunity of hearing before refusal. As compliance with that mandatory hearing requirement could not be shown, the rejection could not stand. The order was therefore set aside, and the assessing officer was directed to reconsider the application afresh after affording the petitioner a proper hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:03:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1104 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417639</link>
      <description>Rejection of an assessee&#039;s application under Section 270AA was unsustainable because the proviso to Section 270AA(4) requires an effective opportunity of hearing before refusal. As compliance with that mandatory hearing requirement could not be shown, the rejection could not stand. The order was therefore set aside, and the assessing officer was directed to reconsider the application afresh after affording the petitioner a proper hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>