<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1101 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417636</link>
    <description>The Tribunal invalidated the reopening of assessment due to a notice issued by a non-jurisdictional officer. It upheld the computation of the Indexed Cost of Acquisition based on the assessee&#039;s share as 1/7th, rejecting the AO&#039;s 1/77th calculation. Additionally, the Tribunal supported the allowance of carry forward of capital loss as directed by the CIT(A). The AO&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the cross-objection by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:03:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=668402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1101 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417636</link>
      <description>The Tribunal invalidated the reopening of assessment due to a notice issued by a non-jurisdictional officer. It upheld the computation of the Indexed Cost of Acquisition based on the assessee&#039;s share as 1/7th, rejecting the AO&#039;s 1/77th calculation. Additionally, the Tribunal supported the allowance of carry forward of capital loss as directed by the CIT(A). The AO&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the cross-objection by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>