https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417612 A workmen's union could represent laid-off workers before the Industrial Tribunal despite a challenge to its registration, because the dispute covered the workmen generally, the cancellation order was stayed, and the rules allowed representation through a union officer. The lay-off declared on 15.04.2007 was treated as unjustified and illegal: the settlement and evidence showed only partial recall of workers, prolonged indefinite lay-off, and insufficient proof to displace the Tribunal's findings, so wages, allowances and consequential benefits were sustained. Any recovery of those monetary dues against the employer in liquidation must be worked out under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, according to the statutory waterfall and workmen's dues rules. en-us Tue, 25 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417612 A workmen's union could represent laid-off workers before the Industrial Tribunal despite a challenge to its registration, because the dispute covered the workmen generally, the cancellation order was stayed, and the rules allowed representation through a union officer. The lay-off declared on 15.04.2007 was treated as unjustified and illegal: the settlement and evidence showed only partial recall of workers, prolonged indefinite lay-off, and insufficient proof to displace the Tribunal's findings, so wages, allowances and consequential benefits were sustained. Any recovery of those monetary dues against the employer in liquidation must be worked out under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, according to the statutory waterfall and workmen's dues rules. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 25 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417612