<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (3) TMI 11 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27837</link>
    <description>Audit material may justify reopening an estate-duty assessment under section 59(b) only if the assessing authority applies its own mind and forms an independent opinion; a reopening based merely on an audit party&#039;s view is impermissible. The court did not finally decide that point and remitted it for fresh Tribunal consideration. The ownership and passing of the firm&#039;s goodwill on death also turned on the partnership deed, including clauses on change in constitution and the rights of working partners, and was likewise sent back for reconsideration. The method of valuing goodwill, including whether income-tax payable or paid must be excluded from super profits, was left open for fresh determination by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:23:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (3) TMI 11 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27837</link>
      <description>Audit material may justify reopening an estate-duty assessment under section 59(b) only if the assessing authority applies its own mind and forms an independent opinion; a reopening based merely on an audit party&#039;s view is impermissible. The court did not finally decide that point and remitted it for fresh Tribunal consideration. The ownership and passing of the firm&#039;s goodwill on death also turned on the partnership deed, including clauses on change in constitution and the rights of working partners, and was likewise sent back for reconsideration. The method of valuing goodwill, including whether income-tax payable or paid must be excluded from super profits, was left open for fresh determination by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>