https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27833 The court held that the jagir lands and residential property received by the assessee were considered joint family property under Hindu Mitakshara law, not individual assets. The compensation received for the jagir lands was also deemed joint family property. Income from investments in the names of minor sons was not included in the assessee's total income. The court referenced previous decisions supporting the joint family nature of such assets and income, ultimately ruling against the individual ownership claims by the assessee. en-us Mon, 02 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:14:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27833 The court held that the jagir lands and residential property received by the assessee were considered joint family property under Hindu Mitakshara law, not individual assets. The compensation received for the jagir lands was also deemed joint family property. Income from investments in the names of minor sons was not included in the assessee's total income. The court referenced previous decisions supporting the joint family nature of such assets and income, ultimately ruling against the individual ownership claims by the assessee. Case-Laws Wealth-tax Mon, 02 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27833